Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by BobCox2, Nov 24, 2013.
| Replies: 15 | Views: 1606
"If you like your nuclear weapons program, you can keep your nuclear weapons program. Period!"
Oh and yea, btw, this deal was announced on Twitter. It's a new world.
Iranian President Rouhani - Iranian people's vote for #moderation & constructive engagement + tireless efforts by negotiating teams are to open new horizons. #IranTalks
#EU High Rep #Ashton: "We have reached agreement between E3+3 and Iran."
CNN - "We think we have a good strong arrangement," Sec. of State John Kerry tells CNN after announcement of nuclear deal. http://cnn.it/1i3eVVK
Barak Ravid - BREAKING: Israeli Prime minister's office says agreement between Iran and world powers in Geneva is "a bad deal"
Jill Douherty (CNN) - @WhiteHouse on #Iran says "overwhelming majority of sanctions regime, including key oil, banking & financial sanctions.. remain in place."
Javad Zarif (Iranian FM)- We have reached an agreement.
AP - BREAKING: Sec. of State Kerry says nuclear deal reached between Iran and Western powers - @KiritRadia_ABC
Ann Curry (NBC reporter) - Our NBCNews can confirm: A nuclear deal has been reached at #IranTalks. At this point it has not been signed.
AP - BREAKING: Obama to make statement Saturday night on Iran nuclear deal from the White House
Julian Borger (Guardian Editor)- Going to be a signing ceremony at the Palais des Nations
AFP - #BREAKING: Iran and world powers agree nuclear deal: EU
Louis Charbonneau (Reuters) - French Foreign Minister Fabius confirms nuclear deal has been reached in Geneva between Iran and six world powers, no details - @reuters
Haaretez - BREAKING: Iran nuclear deal reached. Photo crews called to Palais des Nacions for signing ceremony
Except that their enriched uranium will be diluted to 5%. It needs to be at 90% to be weaponized.
Bah, to hell with your facts ... where's my high-horse?
Actually, it sounded more to me like they'll not even give up the material they've already processed to a higher level, but simply not keep it 'pure'. Maybe that's just what you're saying is "diluted". Which, of course, is meaningless since they can simply enrich more at the TWO NEW FACILITIES they built...
The ability of the American Progressive Left to delude themselves never ceases to amaze me. It was just such disgusting stupidity that helped trigger the Iraq war, because the U.N. was pushing to undo <their> sanctions and get their hands on more oil money...
Well, perhaps you can take riding lessons from this guy. He's certainly made a horse's arse out of Obama... Better yet, why don't you go drool over Teh WON's tie or something?
Any agreement where both parties walk away without exceeding their safe lifetime radiation limit is a good agreement. (No, not really. Give me rads 'til I melt before I'll agree to a neo-Thatcherite politician in No.10.)
So, Iran's enrichment programme has been put stepped down, is this right? Are we saying they won't abide by their agreement? Is that the case? So Iran will be the bad guy if they break the agreement and the US will look like the good guy for having attempted a peaceful, negotiated settlement?
Ah, I see why your panties are firmly wadded. You cannot stand the idea of the US looking like the good guy. OK, I see your pain even if I don't share it.
Obama's tie is drool-worthy, you say? Wow. There's me thinking the US Presidency is all about a popularity-and-riches contest, and it's actually about pithy, sartorial issues. Colour me embarrassed for not realising!
No. Grammar aside.
Yes. Primarily because their claim of a peaceful nuclear power program is not only risible, but has been undercut by evidence. Sadly, you Europeans rallied to the anti-Semitic call and blamed it all on the J00z, so now we have the amazing spectacle of Israel coordinating with Saudi Arabia to attack Iran.
No, Iran will continue to blow American soldiers into little tiny bits, and Obama will go down in history.
Do it again Merv, this time without spin and without appealing to emotion :upyeah:
I already have. Pity you're psychologically incapable of seeing that.
I was tempted to point out every statement I provided was true, but what's the point, really?
I agree with what you said there, Merv - the "really?" part anyway.
Personally, I think you're psychologically capable of anything.
Does not matter when you already made up your mind jmervyn
In true fashion, Republicans opposed Obama's Iran Deal Before They Knew What It Was (washingtonpost.com)
Well, at least there's a modicum of agreement.
Incidentally, here's a better explanation about the non-dilution dilution issue.
View attachment 4966
Wrong. I couldn't enjoy having sex with a dude, or non-human creatures either.
Because, after all, it's those EEEEEBILLL TERRURIST REPUBLIKKKANS who doomed ObamaCare by not sufficiently cheer-leading for something that was shoved up their collective arse. They ought to have gleefully supported sending the J00z a one-way-ticket yet again, those J00-loving bastages.
I suppose for your part, you don't support the principle of mass child sacrifice? Why not? Are you some sort of hateful religious bigot?
P.S. History, I know, eh?
Effortless & complete debunk of the stupid little weasel which 8-Bob insanely believes is credible enough to quote. But it's Bob, after all, so he can't be blamed for living in a fantasy realm where professional idiot Dana Milbank <should> be quoted.
EDIT - We really don't have an ObamaCare thread, so I'll drop this beauty here...
You could always make one jmervyn.
What difference, at this point, does it make?
Did you evangelize sufficiently to your family over the T-day turkey?
Separate names with a comma.