Please respect other members. Please do not post links or information about hacking/warez/cheats.
Read the rules of these forums as we rarely warn before banning. Lost or need RSS check the forum map.

Latest News

Quick Nav
Navigation
Diablo IncGamers
Diablo Wiki
Gallery
Donate/Subscribe
Follow us on Twitter
Diablo 3 Game Info
Basics
Classes
Items
Combat
Monsters
Interface
A-Z Index
Diablo 2 Game Info
Basics
Classes
Items
Runes
Monsters
A-Z Index
Strategies
Diablo I/Hellfire
Forums
Community
Trading
Strategy


Donate and get extra forum perks
Support diii.net

Go Back   Diablo 3 & Diablo 2 Forums > Diablo 3 Community Forums > Diablo 3 Technical Issues and Battle.net
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Diablo 3 Technical Issues and Battle.net Discuss Diablo 3's game engine, color palette, play speed, Battle.net aspects, and other techy stuff here.

View Poll Results: Guesses please, will this be enough for D3
No way man, not a chance 3 33.33%
Maybe just, but its not gonna be pretty 5 55.56%
Yeah, should be smooth 1 11.11%
Easy, no worries 0 0%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2009, 13:26   #1
JimOfTheJungle
DIII.Net Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Tech-heads, your opinion appreciated...

Long time lurker here, making a first post!

Right, what i'd like is simply a GUESS from you guys as to whether a laptop like this will run Diablo 3. I appreciate its total guesswork at the moment, and the difference between running it horribly and jerkily and running it smoothly gives a wide area to aim your guess at. But i think theres enough technically minded people out there to have a good stab, based on what we know about the game so far.

The deal is i need a laptop asap (last one died), and im on a budget.

I'd like to think it will probably run it, and maybe it to not be too jerky. If it wont, no big deal, i'l simply have to get together the cash (one way or another) for a beefier desktop the week before release!

Spec:

Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 processor 2.16GHz
3GB DDR2 RAM
Intel GMA X4500 graphics card.
O/S Vista (probably)

(How the video card does can be seen at http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-G...HD.9883.0.html)

Thanks!
JimOfTheJungle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2009, 14:32   #2
MoonUnit
DiabloII.Net Member
 
MoonUnit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 865
Re: Tech-heads, your opinion appreciated...

I'd not get one with an intel GMA (Graphics Media Accelerator), get one with a dedicated card.
MoonUnit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2009, 18:19   #3
amerikhan
DiabloII.Net Member
 
amerikhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6
Re: Tech-heads, your opinion appreciated...

Quote:
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 processor 2.16GHz - OK
3GB DDR2 RAM - OK
Intel GMA X4500 graphics card. - NO
O/S Vista (probably) - OK
You'll definitely need to buy a quality ATI or NVIDIA graphics card to go with your laptop.
amerikhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2009, 19:25   #4
DIII.Net Site PalRisingred
DIII.Net Site Pal
 
Risingred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 380
Re: Tech-heads, your opinion appreciated...

A laptop would be a waste for gaming unless you're willing to drop some major cash. I recently bought a decent HP laptop with a dedicated 9M card in it and it still lags while running diablo 2 and some older games. It's great for work and for school, but not for gaming.

Desktops are much cheaper and easier to work with. Laptops are pemanent and they cannot begin to match the performance of even a mid-range desktop.

If you insist on a laptop then you are going to need a dedicated GPU. I would suggest (for laptops) an nVidia GPU because they're better supported with drivers and support.
You cannot run a game with physx, havok, dynamic lighting and the like on an integrated card.
Risingred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2009, 11:44   #5
JimOfTheJungle
DIII.Net Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Re: Tech-heads, your opinion appreciated...

Hold on, this graphics card aint all that bad. Its DX10 capable. According to the website i linked- it performs better than some of the cheap dedicated cards, and it'l play some new games like Fear2(2009) on low settings, and should run fine with older games like say Half Life 2 Lost Coast.

Maybe my view is a bit warped, as ive been playing D2 on an old laptop, its about 5 years old now, celeron 1400 i think, on board gfx (it shipped with 256mb of ram, and a 30gig hd drive to give you an idea how old) Its got an extra gig of ram in now, and despite being old and clogged up with loads of rubbish (since ive never been bothered to wipe and reinstall) it runs d2 flawlessly. Anything seems like a flying machine compared to that!

I appreciate a desktop is what you need for gaming, but i need a budget laptop now more than im bothered about buying something that'l play d3. If the laptop i buy now wont play it, then i'll just buy a tower whenever d3 comes out, that'd probably work out just as expensive as buying a top spec laptop now anyway.

Still- more guesses as to how it'l do are appreciated!
JimOfTheJungle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2009, 13:47   #6
DIII.Net Site PalRisingred
DIII.Net Site Pal
 
Risingred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 380
Re: Tech-heads, your opinion appreciated...

Well, you could always look at performance/benchmark tests for it. I've had one of those not too long ago and, from experience, I can tell you that onboard chipsets are just awful.
1. They're throttled by the FSB of your mobo.
2. They consume system resources unlike a dedicated gpu which has its own memory and that memory runs at its own clock speed (you aren't throttling nor bottlenecking the gpu RAM).
3. "DX10 support", like in games, doesn't mean much. Just because it can plausibly run DX10 doesn't mean it does it well. You'll have problems, in particular with parallax occlusion and wrapping in older games which consistently create the same artifacts, such as little white dots all over the place.

In some instances the X4500 will out-perform the 8XXXM units but rarely and it isn't close to a replacement to a dedicated graphics card. imo if you are set on a laptop and want to get even close to DX10 then you'd probably want an nVidia 9XXXM or the ATi equivalent for the reasons stated above. I mean, the testing speaks for itself.

edit: found a helpful link. It took me a while to dig it up out of my 9489465 bookmarks.
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-...ist.844.0.html
(This links to an external site which compares benchmark performance tests of various gpus in laptops [XXXXM, XXXXM G] and integrated desktop solutions). Look at #132.

edit2: about Diablo II, older systems will likely run it better, believe it or not, because D2 is not a big fan of Direct3D. It runs best in 3DFX mode in an older operating system or using a glide wrapper.
Risingred is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
DIII.NET SPONSOR

Remove Forum Ads
Old 08-07-2009, 11:36   #7
JimOfTheJungle
DIII.Net Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Re: Tech-heads, your opinion appreciated...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risingred View Post
edit: found a helpful link. It took me a while to dig it up out of my 9489465 bookmarks.
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-...ist.844.0.html
(This links to an external site which compares benchmark performance tests of various gpus in laptops [XXXXM, XXXXM G] and integrated desktop solutions). Look at #132.
I linked to that site in my OP!

What do you guys think to this FX card, at a guess would your think it will fare any better?

http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-ATI...0.13885.0.html
JimOfTheJungle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 16:30   #8
MoonUnit
DiabloII.Net Member
 
MoonUnit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 865
Re: Tech-heads, your opinion appreciated...

Marginally better.
MoonUnit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 17:32   #9
DIII.Net Site PalRisingred
DIII.Net Site Pal
 
Risingred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 380
Re: Tech-heads, your opinion appreciated...

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimOfTheJungle View Post
I linked to that site in my OP!
/hangs head in shame

I apologize. I'm too quick with my fingers, not quick enough with the old noggin'.
Quote:
What do you guys think to this FX card, at a guess would your think it will fare any better?

http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-ATI...0.13885.0.html
That is a much more viable card.
I think it's too close to hazard a guess as to how well it would run D3, though, until they release some actual specs. That's much more in the range of what it will likely want to run on, though. (again, my own speculation/opinion).

What I don't like about that card is that it runs on standard DDR2, and not the GDDR that most graphics cards use. You'll get less oomf out of it.
Risingred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 17:56   #10
JimOfTheJungle
DIII.Net Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 6
Re: Tech-heads, your opinion appreciated...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Risingred View Post
/hangs head in shame

I apologize. I'm too quick with my fingers, not quick enough with the old noggin'.


That is a much more viable card.
I think it's too close to hazard a guess as to how well it would run D3, though, until they release some actual specs. That's much more in the range of what it will likely want to run on, though. (again, my own speculation/opinion).

What I don't like about that card is that it runs on standard DDR2, and not the GDDR that most graphics cards use. You'll get less oomf out of it.
Cheers for your opinion. And I appreciate its no more than an educated guess at the moment, though I'd rather listen to other people's educated guesses first, which are likely to be nearer the mark than my own, before i decide what to do.

Ive found a system with that card in, 4gb of ram, and a T4300 processor, plus all the other usual stuff for about £450 (im in the UK) which is in my price range, and decent value i think.

As for the type of ram, that site says its can use all three sorts,

"A speciality of the Radeon HD 4570 is the possibility to use ordinary DDR2 and DDR3 graphic memory (as a cheaper alternative to GDDR3). However, cards that use that kind of memory will be slower than others equipped with GDDR RAM"

Although i cant see anywhere on the manufacturers website saying which it is in this machine, as its just stated as, "512MB ATI Mobility RADEON HD 4570". Guess i'll have to get in touch with the manufacturer to check?
JimOfTheJungle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement System V2.5 By   Branden