Latest Diablo 3 News
DiabloWiki Updates
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    IncGamers Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    747

    Kodiak... why hunger?

    I decided to try this build... sounds funny and effective.

    So I geared up
    Guillaume's
    Duress
    Azurewrath
    Dracs
    Gore rider
    Nosferatu

    What I still miss is a decent shield.

    First question... tiamat? Or whatever?


    Then... this build is based on attacks really fast and a lot of crushing blow.
    Hunger gives a lot of life/mana leech, but lower physical damage. That's why you need weapon like azurewrath, fast and with a lot of magic/elemental damage.

    Ok, nice, blabla... but, unless tiamat does this huge difference (i don't think so) this build is still really slow in killing large number of mobs... crushing blow with weak enemies isn't that usefull, and your damage still sucks.

    Now... why hunger? Really, I can't stand the point in using it. Of course, a lot of life leech, but 100+% of life leech is calculated on physical damage... which is low!
    So, why not using Fury (faster attack) or maul (stunning effect) with some more life leech eq?
    If you deal 100 damage, 100% life leech means 100 life... if you deal 300 damage, 33% life leech is still 100 life gained!

    Do you really care that much about life leech? Feral rage? Why not?


    Really, this thing is getting me crazy... why hunger, why????

  2. #2
    IncGamers Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,667

    Re: Kodiak... why hunger?

    No reason really. Hunger is an underpowered skill, and some people just like using underpowered builds sometimes.

  3. #3
    IncGamers Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Amazon Basin
    Posts
    1,041

    Re: Kodiak... why hunger?

    You aren't the first to have played a Kodiak and express disappointment with its performance. Unfortunately, a bug results in a Werebear using Hunger only actually executing every other attack, which means that their fastest attack rate is effectively 8 frames, not 4. The build was proposed before this was known, and it was supposed to be easier to achieve a 4 frame attack rate with Hunger than with Maul or Fire Claws.

    As it stands, this isn't the case. Beyond the supposed attack rate advantage, Hunger only gets +30% Attack Rating more than Maul, and costs one less mana than Fire Claws. Otherwise, the quartering of physical damage and effective doubling of attack rate mean that, compared to Maul or Fire Claws at fastest attack rate, a Werebear effectively steals life and mana equivalent to a standard attack with 1/8 Hunger's displayed percentages: level 20 Hunger (176%) is equivalent to adding 22% (176/8) Life and Mana stolen per hit to a standard attack.

  4. #4
    IncGamers Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    747

    Re: Kodiak... why hunger?

    Sad to hear this... i thought i finally found a good build for a dudu.

    I'm really disappointed that i can't find any dudu build that is not worse than a similar build of another char :(

    Thank you both

  5. #5
    IncGamers Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    371

    Re: Kodiak... why hunger?

    Yeah, the bug makes Hunger even worse than it already would have been. Werebear druids can still wreck some demons with Maul, though, which is what I'd do.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •