0
If I had to bet my coins on the 2nd mafioso at this time I'd say it's Kegs. They voted for eachother with Phil during d1 when they saw that the townies lynched one of their own without their help, creating more cover for themselves. That's a long shot though, but I'm not getting it from BA:
You and Zokar, which were the two quotes you provided in the post I was responding to. They were largely the same case, but Zokar's was built upon yours I believe.
I would say that I could see the logic in their cases. If it had come down to it I would have voted her in favor of a no lynch, but I felt more strongly about phil and solar at that point.
I wrote this during N1 of the ASoIaF game:
I didn't think you were overwhelmed. I didn't think you had trouble keeping up with new lingo. If you had a question you asked. You got your hands dirty by throwing out our own trains of thought.Originally Posted by Goryani
Compare that to this game. Just about every good thing I have to say about your play last game is quite the opposite this game. The most disturbing trait I see in you I'll paraphrase as being afraid to speak unless spoken to. You aren't re-reading the thread. You say you should learn more about the roles in order to participate yet I don't see that you've actually done so.
Such an abrupt change in behavior is most commonly found when someone used to playing townie receives a mafia role for the first time. Townies aren't usually afraid to post their thoughts while mafia frequently are. They are afraid of slipping up and getting lynched. I'm not certain of your role PM in the ASoIaF game, but I think it's closer to townie than mafia. Therefore, you receiving a mafia role this game can still cause your change in behavior.
Which theories were hard for you to get? Why didn't you ask questions if you had them?
Multiple times you mentioned lack of discussion as a reason why you weren't participating in the game. "Woe is me: I would participate more if only there was more discussion I could participate in" looks to be an accurate translation. If that isn't accurate, then why did you mention the lack of discussion? What goal did you hope to achieve?
Are you more worried about finding mafia or being lynched?
You don't seem afraid of possibly driving a second Lynch. Does this concern you? I almost just voted phil cause of that post and you were a strong reason for my moar vote as well (fair or not)
Thoughts?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
This is a small game. One more mislynch = LYLO.
Phil isn't radiating towniness but neither are are lot of other players. Phil is acting scummy enough to vote. However, there are only two mafia yet more than two are acting scummy enough to vote for. One scummy player is townie. I'm not voting until I get a better read on which one it is.
I think it's incorrect to say I'd be driving a second lynch today when Phillinnicus was already a L-1 (for a moment) before I made that post.
I want Phillinnicus to engage and respond and talk in the hopes of determining if he is townie. I don't know how to get him to talk without directing things his way since he doesn't seem to participate in anything else this game.
See also post 168. D2 in a normal game doesn't usually come with the issue of too many scum to be scum.
Bookmarks