0
/frightening flashback
Thanks a bunch, Steve!![]()
FotD: Research shows that everyone can learn some echolocation with practice. Of course, blind people excel.
I prefer the opposite: specialization and extremism. The human population is big enough that it's Ok to focus like a laser beam on one thing. Then again, MacGyver is a pretty cool show.
I can do this.
I was sort of in the mood for drawing and then I saw this. I threw my drawing pad behind me and laughed.
And this one made me laugh harder at myself. Draw? More like childish scribbles!!!
Last edited by Leopold Stotch; 17-01-2013 at 00:29.
It <could> be anything. Sadly, we don't know enough about the collapse of the Mayan civilization, but the Romans, the Japanese, and the Aztecs(?) were highly sophisticated and specialized societies which, while 'officially' falling to outside conquest or interference, were thoroughly rotten before actually collapsing.
Well, I disagree. Bear in mind that what I'm referring to is the tendency of someone to become a cog in the social machinery, not the ability to become a master craftsman. When your society is completely interdependent and reliant upon others fulfilling their roles, you achieve maximum productivity but also increasing vulnerability. I can neither shoe a horse nor fix an engine, but if I can't trade my military or IT skills because the markets are reduced to barter, what good are the IT skills?
It might be a good Masters' thesis to determine which is more actually vulnerable - a cohesive inter-dependent society, or a cohesive independent society. My money's on the latter.
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
RAH
Thank you; good recall. Louis L'Amour was another example.
I'm not as 'radical' in my view as H. was, but I'm just pointing out that the 'specialization' concept, while improving the overall communal situation, weakens its potential resiliency for the same reason. IMO there's a happy middle ground, but America hasn't been there since before 1950.
Everyone but the elite used to have a garden and chickens in the backyard.
Bookmarks