Latest Diablo 3 News
DiabloWiki Updates
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    IncGamers Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    21

    0 Not allowed!

    50 vit or 20 all resist?

    Which is better? Im lvl 50

    EDIT: So I ended up getting some cheap rings to test this and here is what I found:

    Sacrificing 84 Vit for 30 All Res:

    Lowered my max health by 7%
    (New HP - 31344, Old HP - 33696)

    Reduces damage from all sources by 5.73%
    (Old reduction - 24.03%, New reduction - 28.38%)

    So just looking at those numbers, it seems like vit is still more useful somehow


    Last edited by Shadoninja; 30-07-2012 at 05:11.

  2. #2
    IncGamers Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    27

    0 Not allowed!

    Re: 50 vit or 20 all resist?

    I actually have a similar question quite often. I have an amulet on my level 60 wizard that gives me 90 intelligence and 187 vitality. I have seen amulets that give like 100 intelligence 80 vitality but +25 all resists. So I am not sure if that 25 all resists is more important than the 107 vitality I lose.



  3. #3
    IncGamers Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    virginia
    Posts
    50

    0 Not allowed!

    Re: 50 vit or 20 all resist?

    It depends on a lot of your other stats but I'd imagine 20 all resists will almost always be better than 50 vit



  4. #4
    IncGamers Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    21

    0 Not allowed!

    Re: 50 vit or 20 all resist?

    Did some numbers if you guys wanna check them out



  5. #5

    0 Not allowed!

    Re: 50 vit or 20 all resist?

    Quote Originally Posted by Shadoninja View Post
    Reduces damage from all sources by 15.3%
    (Old reduction - 24.03%, New reduction - 28.38%)
    I don't understand the math
    that looks like 4.35, not 15.3




  6. #6
    IncGamers Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    21

    0 Not allowed!

    Re: 50 vit or 20 all resist?

    I did 24.03/28.38 to find the exact % OF the % gained if that makes sense lol



  7. #7
    IncGamers Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    74

    0 Not allowed!

    Re: 50 vit or 20 all resist?

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesL View Post
    I don't understand the math
    that looks like 4.35, not 15.3
    It's neither.

    Before you were taking 75.97% of a monster's damage (i.e., reducing all damage by 24.03%), after you take 71.62% of a monster's damage, which is a spread of 4.35%, but is really a 5.73% reduction in actual damage taken relative to your beginning point (75.97x = 4.35 = 5.725944%)

    Remember, going from, in the extreme case, 98% damage reduction to 99% damage reduction looks like only 1%, but it means you're taking 50% less damage than you were before (taking 2% before and 1% after).




  8. #8
    IncGamers Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    21

    0 Not allowed!

    Re: 50 vit or 20 all resist?

    Quote Originally Posted by Solwolf View Post
    It's neither.

    Before you were taking 75.97% of a monster's damage (i.e., reducing all damage by 24.03%), after you take 71.62% of a monster's damage, which is a spread of 4.35%, but is really a 5.73% reduction in actual damage taken relative to your beginning point (75.97x = 4.35 = 5.725944%)

    Remember, going from, in the extreme case, 98% damage reduction to 99% damage reduction looks like only 1%, but it means you're taking 50% less damage than you were before (taking 2% before and 1% after).
    Thank you that was what I just found out



Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •