0
Excuse me? Check the facts.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/UAW...21102-673.html
How is it Obama? Because he bailed out GM?
Romney lies and hopes to get away with it based on your belief in Blind trust of his Conservatism.
A year and a half ago when Mitt Romney officially tossed his hat in the presidential ring, questions about his investments arose immediately. Having faced similar questions in his previous run for president, Mitt now had the perfect answer: these investments weren’t his. His wealth was now in a blind trust controlled by someone else.
Ironically this seems to be a theme for the Romney campaign. Interested in Mitt Romney’s work at Bain Capital? You’re going to have to exercise some blind trust in Mitt Romney because this information is off the table, according to Mitt.
Interested in the taxes that Mitt Romney pays? You will have to show a little blind trust in Mitt because he’s only going to release the two years that his accounting firm has meticulously cleaned for public view.
Interested in specific policy in a Mitt Romney presidency? You just need a bit of blind trust because Mitt Romney isn’t going to give you any specifics.
Of course the blind trust doesn’t only apply to you, the American voter. Ever since securing his party’s nomination for president, Mitt Romney has put his policies in a blind trust. Essentially from day to day Romney is completely unaware of his current position on a given topic until he is coached on the answer that polls agree make him the most relatable.
At this point Romney has changed his position on abortion, minimum wage, health care mandates, Iran, *** rights, the GM bailout, climate change, tax cuts, immigration, Pell grants, and the 47%, just to name a few.
Thanks to many voters’ blind trust in fallacies about Barack Obama they are willing to vote for anyone who labels themselves as “severely conservative” over the president. And if Mitt Romney wins the presidency on November 6th, he will owe it all to blind trust.
Oh, I have. Given that you source Jon Stewart and a lawsuit filed by the UAW, I'm pretty comfortable assuming that I'm AT LEAST $25,000 MORE DOLLARS WORTH FAMILIAR WITH THEM THAN YOU! (My losses thanks to THE WON)
Check the facts. Of course, you'll have to burrow pretty deeply any time you search Google because, well, you know...
No, he just recognizes how horrified Americans who are paying attention have become, and plans to ride that home. He may succeed. As I've said previously, I'm not really wild about Romney, but he's running as the Not-Obama just as Obama was swept into office as Not-Bush. In some ways, I'd prefer to have Progressives get their teeth broken off in the asphalt that we're hitting by having Romney lose. As it stands the media & Left will spin on a dime, and while they've let Obama blame the four years of his Presidency on Bush, they'll immediately assign blame for the catastrophe on Romney. The only reason I won't vote Obama just for others to suffer is that if he gets to load the Supreme Court, it won't just be a ten-year American Dark Age we're in for, but a much, much longer one.
I'm trying to install a hybrid wood/oil boiler. Green the planet, you know? I can't even find out if they're legal any longer in this Socialist Utopia - while Bloomberg turns away another state's National Guard disaster relief assistance because he doesn't want them carrying guns. Goddamnned fascists.
Should I put you and Ted Nugent on Death watch?
Ted's got a self-deprecating sense of humor, you know. He knows how silly he sounds.
My money's on Ted if your bro actually has the balls, BTW, just like pansy-arsed silver-spoon elitist Lawrence O'Donnell challenging Mitt's son to a fist-fight. Cowardly little ***** would pull lawyers out faster than I can say "cage match" if Tagg accepted. Hopefully Tagg can publicly humiliate the little punk, like with a charity boxing match.
It ended up not being a close election at all; Goldman Sachs ended up winning with over 98% of the vote . . .
He's not that stupid anymore.
Too true.
Ah, yes, "you types". Funny how the hate-filled Marxist Revolutionary crowd, who believe the end justifies the means and that violent overthrow of the establishment is an essential component of human progress, always finds violence as a characteristic only in their opponents. Freedom fighters, all.
Funny, "Whelp, you said dead or jail. Let's go, puss!'" doesn't really seem like the convoluted horsecrap you're shoveling now. Of course, it could simply be that you're pitiful and cowardly; I always forget that possibility. I ought to be a lot more cognizant of it in the future - you Wesley Mouch types are in command now...
Haha, you're so sad. Hope your not too disappointed when the world doesn't end.
Bookmarks