0
On the other hand, it would be very short sighted to assume that these attacks are all because of personal and individual failures to keep your details secure. I work as a programmer (why are we talking about our work?) and several colleagues have had there accounts hacked, and these are fairly security minded people. Not proof of anything of course, but ignoring either possibility is not right.
And gaining access to a database with active sessions is not the same as gaining access to an account database. In fact if it is indeed the chat system that has an injection weakness for example, that explanation would make sense on a high level. We can't really know more without more knowledge about the systems or an official explanation from Blizzard though.
If the problem is in the chat system then why would they force us to join general chat when we log in?
And maybe it is for everyone's best to reiterate, that dial-in authenticaters and physical/mobile authenticators aren't the same. Dial-in authenticators don't work for D3 and can't protect the account like physical/mobile authenticaters do. There were a lot of reports from people who thought they were safe, got hacked, and realized only afterwards that the dial-in authenticator didn't offer any protection at all...
Because they are the hackers...?
Leave channel is your friend.
I think they made you automatically join the General channel in the last update as a quick and easy fix to people being disconnected every few minutes. It was even a Blizzard-approved "fix" to join to the General channel to prevent these disconnects. I can play only 10-15 minutes before being disconnected when not on the General channel, and one of my friends has the same problem. Another friend we play with doesn't have that problem, so I'm assuming it's ISP-related.
"Database injection" (a.k.a. SQL injection) actually doesn't require any sort of special access. The whole point of it is to use a public interface to the database, like a login form. Firewalls don't really come into the picture. Fortunately, it's also easily thwarted.
As others have pointed out, the word on the grapevine is that it's a form of session spoofing. All of the eyewitness accounts I've read support this. The only problem is that most eyewitnesses know as much about computer security as a blind man knows about color. Honestly, I doubt we'll ever get any verifiable info.
Gold Farm.jpg
Well, here are two in one page!
In Australia, we get the guy4game links all the time.
I really hope NO ONE is buying that gold, not just because of the hack risk, but because it is STUPIDLY expensive!!
$32 for 1 million, no way!
I expect when the RMAH comes on line for the exchange rate to be $5 for 1 mill.
Any more then that , and Blizzard are smoking crack.
(Unfortunately, the world is full of idiots that WILL pay too much, in which case I will be selling loot and retiring!)
Bookmarks