0
Krim, you seem to know a lot more than Gurnison, but your explanation isn't why I've done it.
Triple negative is confusing at first, but it seems like the barb isn't WWing and I'm hitting?why does sass then not get hit when not being able to be outside of range when both are whirlwinding and not assuming the barbarian has no brains and therefore weren't whirlwinding in the first place?
The out maneuvering I've been describing is a delayed, angled WW into the barb as he is whirling. You will hit, he will not. There is a dangerous part, such as when you go farther and he is starting a new hit check. The scenario is now him hitting and you don't. Try not to stick around to be hit.
Block does give me some leniency, but not enough to take on a barb. Only by mastering what I described above did I have a chance. Well...a really bad barb once tried to zerk me and one WW pass hit him every time. ><
The issue of shields is a big one. Ultimately, it's only delayed things. The two of us deal even less damage (me a rough 3/4 due to block factor, and him 1/2 due to a lack of a weapon). As long as I don't forget how to get the "unanswered hits" as many call them, I'd still win.
BTW: Mo has developed a kick / bow solution. This is much safer than WWing the barb, but was designed fitting his play style. I took what I learned in Ghost vs Ghost duels, used them on a barb and *surprise* what made me hit them also made me hit a barb. This method is much more dangerous, not nearly as successful, but very fun and indeed works. I can't claim to PK all barbs with ease (not even wiz can be that good), but I have already PK'd many to their surprise.
No true gm'er would call someone bm for stacked resists and using a shield, that's the dumbest thing I've heard, and that's after reading gurnison's post for probably over a month, so that is saying a bit much.
That whole bit with Sass being "selective" about which duels to remember and which ones to conveniently to forget is more applicable to folks with gurnison's mindset. BMer's who take any step to win (because we all know winning is everything =P) are of course going to forget their losses conveniently.
whats the point aguing over bva vs sin? There just no way any type of sin can do **** vs godly bm barb, yea mind blast for the win. What eva man just get back to the topic lol. And stay away from bva vs sin, godly bm bva just simply can not be beaten by any sin end of the story.
If only that were true.
It only applies to those who lack experience with sins. Barbs are always tough, but never impossible.
You have more skills than MB. WW for instance.
Seriously, just kill him. LT won't work, you can't sorb WW and a shield is not going to make it impossible.
Bookmarks