0
Basically, you are trying to refute the person above you, while making another statement.
Really easy rule... example:
Start: I ate McDonald for lunch
Next: No, you are wrong. You went out jogging.
Next: No, you are wrong. You were only walking.
Rules are simple:
1) the refute must be related, even by a nuance.
(from above example:
No, you are wrong. Biggie is better than Tupac. <--- would not be acceptable
2) Be creative, feel free to lengthen your sentence with lots of ";" or other conjunctions. Simple statements make boring games.
3) Refute must be a sentence.
ex: No, you are wrong [always start with this]. Walking is for losers. You said you aren't a loser. <--- this would be unacceptable
HOWEVER: You said walking is for losers, thus you didn't walk. <--- that would be okay
4) Feel free to switch up pronouns/names to refer to the most recent person (the one above you), so that you are not referring to person 1 all the time.
(And please... no run-ons. If you can make your sentence grammatically correct, feel free to make the sentence the length of a paragraph.)
(Tolerable insult makes fun game! But keep it below the neck and abve the waist. Stay away from simple flame war!)
Clear enough? Let's begin!
Start:
Big-foot with hairy back but small head exists in the North American mountains as a goat herder; it inspired the cyclop legend.
Well, we all know this is false cuz big-foot actually lives in Washington. His name is Bill Gates, he's not hairy, and he's not a herder of goats but rather the computer industry with Windows leading the market. He did not inspire the cyclop legend, but he did invent the keyboard maneuver which is similar to to licking your elbow, trying to reach your anus with your tongue (for lack of a better body twisting move >.>), and kicking yourself with your heel in the back of your head at the same time.
No your wrong; it's just the English word for a Chupacabra.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chupacabra
As you can see from the Details at the link you got everything about it wrong.
Well bob, you're wrong cuz you're always wrong and this time is no different ;] Everybody knows that wikipedia is full of lies that the government paid the team to put up so that you may be fooled.
D3 General & D2 Newcomer Moderator
The government's check bounced, so Wikipedia removed their entries. This has been well-documented in both the Wall Street Journal and my imagination.
"Hoveround takes me where I want to go."
No, you are wrong; the government paid in cash fresh from the mint.
wikipedia is accurate [citation needed].
Seriously, you are wrong, only petty change is created at the mint. The real currency is printed at the Bank of Canada.
No you are wrong; moose do not count as currency
No you are wrong; moose do count as currency in some parts of the world.
Both wrong if used as currency they are Meese!
Bookmarks