0
Just took it and got the same score as Gandhi. Is that good or bad?Originally Posted by jmervyn
"Assault Weapon" has a specific meaning, though it's a bit more broad and differs from what was put in legislation. I find it humorous though that the resident mental midget simultaneously criticizes the arbitrary, political definition. And insists we use it.Originally Posted by Stoutwood
assault weapon
n.
An infantry weapon, such as an assault rifle, designed for individual use
Economic Left/Right: -1.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.18
Economic Left/Right: -1.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00
I'm a liberal apparently
I certainly hope that people don't decide to ban "assault weapons" under that definition. I collect military antiques.Originally Posted by FreezerBurn
Me too! I was like -3 and -4 respectively.Originally Posted by stormrage112345
Um, it's still contradictory though. Does life begin when the baby is born, or when the baby first feeds? If it's the latter, a baby that is born but can't feed is not "alive", and therefore was not alive when it was born, contradicting your statement that your "scientific" relatives believe that life begins at birth. Just looking for clarification.Originally Posted by FreezerBurn
No, I think we have established that the political meaning is "scary looking". But putting words into other people's mouths is what you're best at, after all.First you claim the term has no real meaning.
In a political discussion, if you say "assault weapons", we're going to assume you mean "assault weapons" in the political sense. It makes perfect sense to a rational person. We can't be helped if your ignorance of the subject leads you to use words that have a political meaning without realizing it.Then when presented with the real meaning, you want to use a politician's arbitrary definition of the term. That's pure genius.
Module even specifically stated he assumed you were referring to the recent assault weapons ban, and being the classy person you are, your first response is "LEARN TO USE A DICTIONARY STUPID!" Just another piece of evidence in the "FreezerBurn is both clueless, and a complete *******." category of facts.
Translation: I've got nothing, but here's a cute reply to draw attention away from my failure to back up my opinions.
Way to go, champ. Way to go.
So, Freezer, you made a blanket statement labeling a large portion of this forum's membership as fat, white racist homophobes, and when asked for proof, you yell "Smeg did it!!!!", and expect us to take you seriously?
I know you have a reason not to want to post links (since you lost all credibility in that field), but come on...you need to support your racist propaganda. And yes, I think singling out "whites" as racist and homophobic is, indeed, racist itself. Even if YOU are white.
My hope is that Llad will be back, call me old fashioned but I miss it when anyone leaves or get flamed, the more they are hated, the more I love and defend them.
How about we call you supermod? :smiley:Originally Posted by DOC
Bookmarks