Latest Diablo 3 News
DiabloWiki Updates
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 62
  1. #51
    IncGamers Member Gibbzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    2,238

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by stormrage112345
    Why doesn't storm just post a nudie pic? Until then, this will do. http://www.libidomag.com/nakedbrunch...ome/rome04.jpg
    not cool...




  2. #52
    IncGamers Member Dondrei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In my pants
    Posts
    36,856

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Gibbzilla
    not cool...
    You should see what the Romans put their candles on and what they put their statues on. Priapus and Herms. Things were a little different back then...




  3. #53
    IncGamers Member jmervyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    12,482

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by dondrei
    You should see what the Romans put their candles on and what they put their statues on. Priapus and Herms. Things were a little different back then...
    To say nothing of their probable religious practices involving same. Nothing Madonna wouldn't stoop to, but I doubt many people would imagine it.




  4. #54
    Banned Sir EvilFreeSmeg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In Anakalaha's sock drawer
    Posts
    15,435

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by stormrage112345
    Why doesn't storm just post a nudie pic? Until then, this will do.
    Has it ever occured to anybody why I don't make direct links to some pictures? Imagine if Zodi's kids clicked on this pic. You try explaning to her how her kids were exposed to things not appropriate for young kiddies.

    Do us all a favor, before linking to such things, take off the www and http and dot-whatever. Otherwise, banning could ensue.




  5. #55
    IncGamers Member Dondrei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In my pants
    Posts
    36,856

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Conservative Inc
    Has it ever occured to anybody why I don't make direct links to some pictures? Imagine if Zodi's kids clicked on this pic. You try explaning to her how her kids were exposed to things not appropriate for young kiddies.

    Do us all a favor, before linking to such things, take off the www and http and dot-whatever. Otherwise, banning could ensue.
    Much as I hate to agree with Smeg, that would probably be a wise choice. Although I would add that the same goes for those naked fatties plasmo posted, pixellated or not.




  6. #56
    IncGamers Member Dondrei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In my pants
    Posts
    36,856

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by jmervyn
    To say nothing of their probable religious practices involving same. Nothing Madonna wouldn't stoop to, but I doubt many people would imagine it.
    Their religion was so much more fun than any of ours. Even with all the animal sacrifices.




  7. #57
    Banned Sir EvilFreeSmeg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In Anakalaha's sock drawer
    Posts
    15,435

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by dondrei
    Much as I hate to agree with Smeg, that would probably be a wise choice. Although I would add that the same goes for those naked fatties plasmo posted, pixellated or not.
    That's all I'm asking. Make it so to see the pic somebody has to go through several steps on their part to see it. That ensures that I am not responsible for their seeing the image and thus not in violation of the OTF rules.

    Also by not making things a direct link, you are doing your part to help prevent somebody from accidentally opening up an image that is NSFW. How would you feel if you posted a link and somebody got fired for clicking on it? YOU provided the link. It is entirely possible that an accidental click could open a NSFW link. That's why you make it a multi-step process.

    This method does not excuse somebody from posting the website containing stuff entirely against the OTF rules and it's family-friendly forum status. No porn, no overt blood guts and gore, excessive profanity, etc. All it does is provide you a way of assisting people in seeing things they might not otherwise see. And if they do choose to see it, their bleeding eyes are entirely their own fault.




  8. #58
    IncGamers Member Arbedark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Redditch
    Posts
    4,547

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Conservative Inc
    That's all I'm asking. Make it so to see the pic somebody has to go through several steps on their part to see it. That ensures that I am not responsible for their seeing the image and thus not in violation of the OTF rules.

    Also by not making things a direct link, you are doing your part to help prevent somebody from accidentally opening up an image that is NSFW. How would you feel if you posted a link and somebody got fired for clicking on it? YOU provided the link. It is entirely possible that an accidental click could open a NSFW link. That's why you make it a multi-step process.

    This method does not excuse somebody from posting the website containing stuff entirely against the OTF rules and it's family-friendly forum status. No porn, no overt blood guts and gore, excessive profanity, etc. All it does is provide you a way of assisting people in seeing things they might not otherwise see. And if they do choose to see it, their bleeding eyes are entirely their own fault.

    Judging by this, its ok to post the steps you need to go through to obtain an "eye bleeder"

    Edit: Ignore this post. My "eye bleeder" is no longer accessible via the steps it used to be...


    Arb




  9. #59
    Banned Sir EvilFreeSmeg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In Anakalaha's sock drawer
    Posts
    15,435

    0 Not allowed!
    Actually I would suggest you type in Free*BANNED*




  10. #60
    IncGamers Member buttershug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Centre of known civilization
    Posts
    8,208

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Conservative Inc
    That's all I'm asking. Make it so to see the pic somebody has to go through several steps on their part to see it. That ensures that I am not responsible for their seeing the image and thus not in violation of the OTF rules.

    Also by not making things a direct link, you are doing your part to help prevent somebody from accidentally opening up an image that is NSFW. How would you feel if you posted a link and somebody got fired for clicking on it? YOU provided the link. It is entirely possible that an accidental click could open a NSFW link. That's why you make it a multi-step process.

    This method does not excuse somebody from posting the website containing stuff entirely against the OTF rules and it's family-friendly forum status. No porn, no overt blood guts and gore, excessive profanity, etc. All it does is provide you a way of assisting people in seeing things they might not otherwise see. And if they do choose to see it, their bleeding eyes are entirely their own fault.
    And under no circumstances, any kind of linkage to tubgirl. I hate even mentioning her. And I thought I had a good grasp of the depths of depravity people are capable of.




Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •