USC beat Fresno by 10. Louisiana Tech beat Fresno by 12.
That is all.
Texas beat Texas A&M by 11. Colorado beat Texas A&M by 21.
I think we've all seen how that one played out today...
I wouldn't compare Louisiana Tech with anyone in the Big 12, save Baylor, but thats just me.
But you are comparing USC, ranked #1 in the country, to Lousiana Tech based on relative scores against a common opponent, which doesn't seem to mean much per my example?
Not to mention that "team A beat Team B and Team B beat Team C, therefore Team A will beat Team C" comparisons are almost always complete horse****. Certain strategies, talents and outside conditions make these types of logic problems basically useless in terms of predicting winners.
In other words, so what?
this thread makes no sense so it is being hijacked into a USC/UCLA thread
[bad accent]pay that man his money[/bad accent]Originally Posted by Ash Housewares
lot of game left, but USC has around 300 rush yards in the first half and this game has looked about as close as the Big12 Championship
Th...th...th...that's all folks! USC is trouncing UCLA 52-6 with about 12:00 to go in the game.
USC scored 66, Texas scored 70
70 is more than 66, give Texas the national title
that is all
:uhhuh:
Fight on!!
nough said,
-El Malo :uhhuh:
Yeah I was just kinda dickin around.
I know football does not exhibit the transitive property, but if Vince Young can play against USC like he did against Colorado (whos defense is ranked higher in most categories than USC) then the Trojans might be in trouble.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks