View Full Version : Why not 20 WW/10 Conc?
churinga
20-03-2008, 23:48
I saw in many guides that recommend 10WW/20Conc in skill points. However, why not 20WW/10Conc? In my opinion, WW is a much more offensive and effective skill than Conc while attacking packs of monsters. Only when facing individual monsters should we use Conc (correct me if I'm wrong). Therefore, WW should be maxed out to reach top effect. 10 points in Conc should be good enough to handle individual monsters even if they are Champions. I think it is especially important when you are using a weapon that can reach the last WW bp, while it doesn't reach the last bp for Conc.
Any opinions on this? :evil:
Tor Land
21-03-2008, 11:10
I agree! Conc is a boring skill anyways. You could also just ignore shout and max both too :P (10 shout last)
churinga
21-03-2008, 11:15
I agree! Conc is a boring skill anyways. You could also just ignore shout and max both too :P (10 shout last)
Thanks for the comments! :grin: I guess I'm gonna try what you suggested, 20 WW/20 Conc/5 Shout (at beginning), then rest to Shout :thumbsup: But will it be too dangerous during the WW, due to low def? :undecided:
BTW, my existing skills: 20 Mastery, 20 BO, +prereq
I think that maxing ww is a good idea. Not so sure about throwing points into conc tho, since your mastery + BO already fortify that skill. Plus 1pt conc yeilds about the same AR as WW@20.
Still, while it's not a bad pvm switch skill, I would think that you'd find berserk much more usefull overall, especially in high lvl areas against PI and oblivion knights. Also, shout adds great damage to berserk, which functions well at 1pt as well.
If you were thinking ubers, then ww isn't the right skill vs them in any case.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.