PDA

View Full Version : Ok how do you guys like this build?


Meklar
25-06-2007, 23:00
I was looking in the thread above for lightning builds, There all gone. When I click on any of them it says 404 errors. So... I figured Id ask here what you guys think. I know I asked a few days ago about the dual build and I saw what you were saying about lightning and forzen orb being to weak.

So how is this for a pure lightning sorc?

20 Charged bolt
20 lightning
20 Chain lightning
20 Lightning mastery
20 nova
1 telekinesis
1 teleport
1 warmth

She should do some pretty nice damage right?

Meklar
25-06-2007, 23:58
Come on! You know you want to reply!

I see that 26 people have looked at this thread and not one of you gave me a reply :(

It makes me sad!

Samohtnnam
26-06-2007, 00:09
I tried to replay but this forum timed out.

Samohtnnam
26-06-2007, 00:09
I tried to replay but this forum timed out.

Epsilon Eyez
26-06-2007, 00:50
Should do well, given that its using all the synergies. Even Nova.

Meklar
26-06-2007, 01:33
Anyone else got any other comments?

stephan
26-06-2007, 02:39
Immunes are going to be a problem. It looks like a normal pure lightning build, which isn't really advisable without an infinity if you tend to solo a lot.

Thyiad
26-06-2007, 03:04
If you use the sticky to get the 404 error. Then copy the address from the bar into a google search and view the CACHED copy, you should be able to view the guides.

Light sorc without infinity is perfectly viable; I have one one SP. However, you need a decent merc to kill immunes or decent teleporting skills. :grin:

nolan16
26-06-2007, 03:25
My sorc had nearly the same build, but a point in frozen armor. She worked very well (granted she had infinity).

melianor
26-06-2007, 13:01
aehm, this is a standard lightning sorceress skill spec?! ;) What is so special? Yes it will do nice damage! :D

The Lightning builds will be back soon, promise. Will take a bit though. Some restructering going on. Meanwhile i will dig out the builds in the original Sorceress forum threads and relink them. Thanks for pointing this out.