View Full Version : socketable items
chingu4eva
25-01-2007, 03:41
i found some ok socketing items and i socketed them
5os colossus blade
3os eth thresher (sad yea i kno)
anyway. i was goign to put the folloowing runewords into each
5os colossus blade = grief
3os eth tresher = malice
the malice is easy. grief is a little bit higher in price. i was wnodering if i made it woudl there be any barbs out there willing to use it? or would it beome a useless item?
Please dont make a grief in a slow 2 handed weapon. U want speed and the ability to use a shield, so stick with phase blades or zerker axes.
batuchka
25-01-2007, 04:10
If u really want to make a grief in a 2-h sword then make it in either a flamberge or zweihander. Both have base weapon speeds -10/range 3 and the worst roll of grief still makes both swords hit LWWP :P Only a 40ias roll grief colo blade (base weapon speed = 5) would hit LWWP for barbs and it's a really high risk move :( Hmm maybe a Crescent Moon merc pole for that 3os eth thresher is another option? Cheers and happy gaming :laugh:
chingu4eva
25-01-2007, 04:14
k thx for the input well i made the thresher into a malice... i was thinking the open wounds woul help... maybe i can make it into a crescent... maybe
zeskelnec
25-01-2007, 12:27
Crescent is so much more powerful than Malice.
I rolled only one malice since RW have existed.
Eilo Rytyj
25-01-2007, 14:39
Yup, you'd need an IAS roll of 39 or 40 on a Grief CB for it to be of any use on a WW barb. Even then, a Berserker Axe beats it on damage (24-71 base for the zerker, 25-65 on the CB).
And lets not forget those unholy requirements, 189 str and 110 dex...
...ugly.
sirwhere
25-01-2007, 14:41
ugly is the looks of the zerker ^^
Eilo Rytyj
25-01-2007, 14:50
ugly is the looks of the zerker ^^
Agreed!
10chars
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.