New sorceress build?

[mystique missourian]

I think i found a new sorceress build that is if no one else has found this 1. ok here i go....you make a blaze sorceress and then when people chase you you make a blazeing fire pit by running in a square or a sphere all filled up in the middle well of coarse you have to have fast run and walk speed. chime in and tell me your thoughts



I call her a pit sorc

fire
*********
*********
*********
*********
*********

[Ytse]

Have you tried this?

[acdcrocks]

i have an idea mix metoer with that, make monsters or pvprs run after u and cast blaze while there behind u cast meteor ahead and run through it and maybe it will hit them :P i dunno might b fun

[superficial]

I think i found a new sorceress build that is if no one else has found this 1. ok here i go....you make a blaze sorceress and then when people chase you you make a blazeing fire pit by running in a square or a sphere all filled up in the middle well of coarse you have to have fast run and walk speed. chime in and tell me your thoughts



what about fire immunes and ranged attackers?

since blaze has no synergies, you only need around 20-25 points to complete the build. could perhaps diversify and put points into cold or lightning.

[hellspare]

Though time consuming and stopped in it's tracks by ranged attackers, it's not a bad idea. You'd need a support skill that you can cast though, fireball or another tree might suit well.

Pvp though, this just won't work. Unless you have a very strong fireball as well, blaze itself will only kill the stupid pvpers that follow right in your fire. As a sorc, you will most likely be 1 hit by paladins, and you won't be able to to tank guided arrows while running away either.

In the end blaze will just be a support skill, but the sorc will still be a fireball/firewall/whatever sorc.

Good idea though, i'll go make one to test it.

[Epsilon Eyez]

Blaze works well with other low-investment skills, simply because Blaze itself is a low-investment skill. Haven't tried it myself, though.