View Full Version : Whistans Eld or Sur
Zpliffman
10-05-2005, 10:11
Hi, i am making a max block lightning es sorc and i was wondering if i should use a eld in my shield or a sur for more mana?
Does the 7% really help in reducing the dex? or would it be more beneficial to have a sur for more mana?
hulla-hop
10-05-2005, 10:36
well, how much dex does the eld save you? multiply that number by 2 to get how much more mana that is. count in bo too, if you use that from cta. if its less than 50, sur is more beneficial, altho much more expensive too.
lemme know what you figure out :)
Personally the only thing I'd ever use a Sur for is Runewords and cubing Ber. Anything else seems a waste.
hulla-hop
10-05-2005, 14:34
Personally the only thing I'd ever use a Sur for is Runewords and cubing Ber. Anything else seems a waste.
well, for alot of players on nl, a sur is of very little value, so it doesnt matter much if its a "waste"
Saint Sinner
12-05-2005, 08:19
Hi, i am making a max block lightning es sorc and i was wondering if i should use a eld in my shield or a sur for more mana?
Does the 7% really help in reducing the dex? or would it be more beneficial to have a sur for more mana?
Well u figure that a eld rune gives 7%, which is 14 pts into dex...i went with eld, but i dont know...
What's wrong with the old fashioned diamond so you get some res ?
RetroStar
12-05-2005, 13:33
Sur seems like a waste to me, but I'm poor so ya.
Indemaijinj
12-05-2005, 18:02
What's wrong with the old fashioned diamond so you get some res ?
Energy Shield disregards resistances.
MyUserName
13-05-2005, 05:06
I would go with Eld.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.