FC/Rabies VS Charge Pala

[~YouThinkYouKnowMe~]

Heyz ppl :thumbsup:

I'm just wondering 'bout which one of the following to start. FC/Rabies druid or a Charge paladin. So before I make any decision I'd like some feedback on the good and bad points about both of 'em. I'll be (not expecting...) but liking some answers if possible, and some "veteran" comments on these chars. :howdy:

[Cod]

well i've made both and have some problems with either one so i'll run through some of the positives and negatives.

fc/rabies: somewhat rare in that you hardly ever see any other shifter druids in dueling games, but rabies is a wash. you'll get some kills, but in my experiences it's letal but not fast, so people will run to town and complain while their life slowly drains. with 20 points in rabies, your fireclaws is quite a bit lower and often takes an extra hit to kill people over a pure fireclaw build and often that means the difference between winning and losing. my druid had several charms but no bramble though, so maybe a bramble is the difference between being able to kill with rabies and not.

charger: extremely fun, you can 1 hit most casters but ww barbs/sins will be next to impossible to beat, desynch will annoy a lot of people but people get annoyed over everything. i had a lot more fun with this character but charge lock is extremely annoying. i believe it's triggered when you die while charging, but effectively it prevents you from charging again until you leave the game and rejoin.

[~YouThinkYouKnowMe~]

Hmmm... okay pala's in lead by 2-1 then.

[Ethereal.Grizzly]

charg eis tooooo dysnc to use as a primary skill. u will get frustrated and annoyed by its bugginess and prolly just stop with it all together. fc/rabies you can do like 50k rabies and 8k fireclaws and be a well rounded dueler. i say chargers are a frailed class

[~YouThinkYouKnowMe~]

Druid - 3
Pala - 2

That makes druid in lead thanx to you ethereal.grizzly.