PDA

View Full Version : Viscerataunt vs 'Splendor" Runeword


Jayaz_Forteck
21-05-2004, 05:32
Splendor (Eth-Lum) 2 socket shield only:
+1 to all Skills
+10% faster cast rate
+20% faster block rate
+(60-105)% enhanced defense (varies)
+10 to energy
Regenerate Mana 15%
+50% gold from monsters
+20% chance of finding magic items
+3 to light radius

Viscerataunt:
+1 To Sorceress Skills
30% Faster Blocking
+30 Chance to Block %
+100-150% Enhanced Defense
Attacker Takes 10 Lightning Damage

Which is better? First off, Splendor has the advantage of being placeable in a heater, whereas Viscerataunt requires a pul and ladder to upgrade. once upgraded, they're pretty equal:

- Both shields will sport +1 to all skills, so no problems here

- Splendor has 10% fcr, which may be helpfull for hitting the 105% fcr mark. Places this shield closer to a lidless wall.

- Both shields have faster block, however, Viscerataunt has 30%, while splendor only has 20%. Viscerataunt has the advantage here, though now that true 'blocklock' is impossible, how important is this?

- A big one here, Viscerataunt has +30% chance to block, which would be 72% on the shield if upgraded. Splendor would be stuck at 42%, barely better than a lidless wall.

- Viscerataunt wins out in defense by a possible 45%, not a critical stat.

- Splendor adds 15 energy and 15% faster mana regeneration, this helpfull, but again, not a crucial mod, most sorceresses will have enough mana/regen from items/warmth.

- Splendor adds 50% increased gold find, and 20% mf, this is great for pvm, but useless for pvp, it also adds 3 to light radius, a stat which is really not that helpfull.

- Viscerataunt adds 10 lighting damage to attackers, worthless.


Now, my opinion is that Viscerataunt beats out Splendor for dueling. Even if you go for a pure vit sorceress, the possibility for socketing the shield cannot be passed up. For pvm, I'd choose Splendor. It's got fcr, energy/regen, even mf. It's really too bad splendor has no %blocking increase, its pvp value would be significantly higher.

What do the rest of you sorceress players think?

savvyguy
21-05-2004, 06:29
Viscerataunt upgraded is great if you want max block, splendor and/or lidless wall are both better if you are going vita sorc. I don't think anyone would recommend going with max block on splendor.

tydon
21-05-2004, 06:48
For a blocker: Visc

For a mfer Splendor > Lidless
Splendor > rhyme

IMO atleast, unless you ist a lidless, which is pretty dang spendy...

chinaman1472
21-05-2004, 08:51
I wouldn't say Splendor > Rhyme.
Rhyme gives 25% resist + Cannot be Frozen, and much better block.

melianor
21-05-2004, 10:36
Visceratuant: Blocking Shield
Splendor: For Vita-Build and NO blocking or switch MF-Shield

Speldnor > Rhyme since you can still retain +1 skills and some FCR by only loosing 5%mf.

Superhal
21-05-2004, 13:29
cbf doesn't matter that much for sorcs as they (can) tp around and chill doesn't affect casting time.

i don't think splendor was meant to replace rhyme anyway, even though it can. i think it's splendor > lidless. lidless was always "the" +1 skills shield (before the upgrade for visc, but, visc is only for sorcs.) now, you can have a little more variety.

Cyriene
21-05-2004, 14:57
i feel splendor is more of a necro or pally shield rather than a sorc shield.
both of these classes can make splendor in a class specific item giving them the possibility of some nice skills (+4 bs or whatever else you use) or nice resists. sorcs can benefit as well from spelndor of course, but its not that much better than the other shields available already, just another alternative, which is always nice

rachil0
21-05-2004, 17:35
IMO, splendor is terrible. If you want a caster shield pick lidless (better FCR). If you want a shield for your mf switch, rhyme has more (and blocks, and has resists, and uses cheaper runes). If a shield doesn't block, it's largely useless IMO. Splendor is sort of in between rhyme and lidless, and somehow manages to be worse than both.

I do think splendor has one redeeming feature - cheap necro runeword for a totem that has good skill bonuses. Necro's can get away without blocking most easily.

OTOH, I like duress. I like crushing blow, and I like cold damage, and I like resists (albeit small). And I like the idea of there being more runewords out there. :thumbsup:

Jek
21-05-2004, 17:47
splendor is an awesome cheap replacement for HoZ on a hammerdin. And I find it outclassed by Lidless Wall, Rhyme and Vics.

Block: Vics>Splendor
MF: Rhyme>Splendor
ES/No-block: Lidless>Splendor

Tanatus
21-05-2004, 18:52
You missed 1 more important thing about Viscer ... it can be socketed...
Ist into into Viscer make Rhyme or Speledor simply obsolete

HipHop Automust
21-05-2004, 20:44
I wouldn't say obsolete...

Each shield has its ups and downs. However I do feel that Splendor is the last of the bunch. Rhyme is still a great runeword, especially it's resists and mf.

If Splendor had resists it would be > Rhyme. However it does not so it comes down to whether or not resists and block are an issue to you. If you have no need for resists, then go with splendor.

Visc is still a great shield when upgraded, however I do think it's odd that it doesn't have any FCR being that it is a sorc shield :scratch:

HipHop Automust
21-05-2004, 20:49
Also, I'm still one of those sorcs that sports an SS socketed with a 5/5 fire facet... I guess it's just preferences on what you want/need/have.

DarkGod
22-05-2004, 00:48
I think I'd used a splendor instead of my lidless, if my lidless wasnt socketed with a light facet :)

Jayaz_Forteck
22-05-2004, 07:11
I personally think 'Splendor" > Lidless, you're only losing 10% fcr, while there are plenty of other bonuses to make up for it, and it will be much cheaper than isting a lidless.

bronzdragon5545
22-05-2004, 10:38
id go lidless all the way u can have a mf shield on switch

Soepgroente
22-05-2004, 13:24
id go lidless all the way u can have a mf shield on switch
Loses call to arms or a cold armor though......

I say it's nice, sorcies shouldn't block anyway so gogo splendor on mf sorc.

Superhal
22-05-2004, 23:08
i'd use splendor for blocking (non-sorc) + skill, lidless for def + skill, rhyme for cbf + blocking (non sorc). best shield imho is still stormshield, with one of the above on the switch. however, for mf, i would only use a switch 4ist shield.

prion
22-05-2004, 23:24
I might make a splendor for my goldfind sorc, only hurdle is resists. Since I plan to stay in nighmare, I should be able to work around that without too much trouble.

Shanksie1337
22-05-2004, 23:29
dont know what the fuss is about, i agree with whoever said its a mix between rhyme and lidless and manages to be worse that both.

As for a mf sheild, i am sure the majority of sorcs have one weapon/sheild to get there and a switch for the kill, and a Splendor isn't the best for either option.

Superhal
22-05-2004, 23:37
As for a mf sheild, i am sure the majority of sorcs have one weapon/sheild to get there and a switch for the kill, and a Splendor isn't the best for either option.

yep, for sorcs, splendor is a raw deal because of visc. however, i think it's very useful for other chars.

savvyguy
23-05-2004, 07:45
i'd use splendor for blocking (non-sorc) + skill, lidless for def + skill, rhyme for cbf + blocking (non sorc). best shield imho is still stormshield, with one of the above on the switch. however, for mf, i would only use a switch 4ist shield.

people who have 4x ist play just way too much imo.

bronzdragon5545
23-05-2004, 12:12
people who have 4x ist play just way too much imo.

:lol: i have 4x ist mon and a 6x ist crystal sword.
if u think i play to much a friend of mine has a 6x zod hydra bow! just for show tho i always get a laff out of it. :creep:

Superhal
23-05-2004, 12:43
people who have 4x ist play just way too much imo.

nah they're easy to get now from hellforge. i got like 2 so far, but tons of higher runes i could easily trade for ists, as well as 2 mals i could cube into an ist.

bronzdragon5545
23-05-2004, 12:45
ya im non-ladder tho ill be seeing you around when it starts over