The Barbarian’s Tattoos

Posted 20th Apr 2009 09:52 PM by Flux


Bashiok fielded a nit-picky question today, about the Barbarian’s appearance. “If the barbarian in D3 is supposed to be an older version of the same D2 Barbarian, what happened to his tattoos?” Bashiok’s three-word reply:

Blizzard Quote:
It was warpaint.


This sounded like retconning to me, but looking at the official D2 Barbarian artwork... Bashiok appears to be correct. The only marking on the Barbarian in the original Diablo II character design is the blue streak that runs up his chest and over his face and head. He’s unmarked in the earliest concept art. Not until Blizzard added the high fantasy-style character portraits to their website, long after the game’s release, did we see a Barbarian with tattoos and other such details (but no blue stripe warpaint, oddly).

This Barbarian (seen to the right) clearly has tattoos to match his um… enhaned fashion sense, and perhaps the most amazing unique shin guards ever seen outside of a Bruno film, but while that artwork can probably still be considered canon, it’s more of a reinterpretation of the classic look, and clearly doesn’t match the character in the game.




Bookmark and Share

Comments

Page 1 of 1 pages
iamnotdeadyet
Posted 21, Apr 2009 12:15 AM
(0)
 

I am sure that the blue body dye was obtained from a yellow-flowered plant, called woad. The ancient Britons used it.

Hope this clears matters up for you.

Reply
 
Scorch Hellfire
Posted 22, Apr 2009 01:35 AM
(0)
 

So thats why they were called woads… interesting indeed…

Anyways, just thought I’d point out that the concept art of the Barbarian by Samwise that you linked as showing the Barbarian without markings actually shows him with markings on his face and chest and right arm like the others… well the others have a marking on the left arm but same difference…

Reply
 
Register Now
Temporary Tattoos [Unregistered]
Posted 08, Nov 2009 09:12 AM
(0)
 

I too thought it sounded like retconning but must agree.  The blue streak doesn’t look like a tattoo, it looks much more like war paint. After all who’s ever seen a bright blue tattoo?

Reply
 
Page 1 of 1 pages

Syndicate