Diablo III’s Female Characters are Believable?
Posted 3 April 2012 by FluxTheMarySue.com, a “Guide to Girl Geek Culture” has posted an article about the realistic (relatively speaking) appearance of the female characters in Diablo III. The piece isn’t a straight out class-by-class comparison, and it references the presentation of females in WoW and Starcraft as well, but it’s an interesting perspective on the topic.
The article praises the female Barbarian for having muscles (thighs especially) unlike the silly, wafer-thin female battlers some games offer, and appreciates that the genders tend to wear equivalently-styled armor, rather than putting the guys in tin cans and the girls in chain mail bikinis. Yes, Witch Doctor and Barbarian females wear cloth bikinis in the early going, but their male counterparts fare no better. (The piece doesn’t mention
Sheablo.)
So while it’s too early to say how Diablo III will measure up, the female character models shown thus far have me feeling very encouraged. For starters, they are all wearing plausible armor. Their stomachs are covered. The only one who looks a bit waifish is the Wizard, which makes sense, and even she looks like she can tear it up. But the best of the bunch, in my opinion, is the Barbarian. She’s broad-shouldered. She’s buff. She’s got big, muscular thighs, which is exactly what you need if you’re going to be swinging an axe all day. And before you scoff at her bare legs, take note of what her male counterpart is wearing. This armor isn’t meant to be revealing; it’s meant to portray a particular culture. If you’re going to have armor that doesn’t cover a character from head to toe, this is exactly the way to do it. I believe this armor. I believe this character. This is a woman whose physical appearance meshes with the narrative context in which she is presented. Really, that’s all I want to see in a character model, and to find it in Diablo III was a pleasant surprise. Granted, the way your character is dressed in the game will depend on what armor you equip, but the fact that this is the public image they decided to give these women is heartening.
Are the designs perfect? No. Are the starting outfits for the Demon Hunter and the Wizard a bit irksome? Yes. But if we look at these character designs in comparison to the last fourteen years of Blizzard titles, it’s clear that things are continuing to improve for their female characters. And that’s something I can definitely get behind.
Obviously all the gear in the game is very stylized and fantasy-tastic and such, and we’ve had some enjoyable debates about the over-the-top Inferno gear. But whatever faults you may find in the function of the
gear sets, you have to admit that the character models and their outfits are treated with some gender neutrality.
While more gamers are male than female, recent studies and past WoW data suggest that women make up a considerable percentage of Blizzard’s audience. Data on female approval of the chain mail bikini style of female fantasy character is less readily-available, but male approval might be lacking as well. After all, just because you enjoy the visuals on a character doesn’t mean you don’t think it’s appropriate or believable in the game.
Most of us (male or female) enjoy eye candy in our games, but do you appreciate that D3′s female characters have some realism to their body types and clothing? By the same token, do you like that the male characters aren’t all steroidal monsters with pin heads? Or would you prefer the comic book style of mega-hulking dudes and lingerie model females, as still seen in many Asian RPGs?






It’s also nice that the male WD has a beer gut.
Lol, never noticed that. Drinking too much JuJu I guess!
In all honesty though, I think it’s idiotic how muscular they make men usually. Have you guys SEEN Starcraft II’s Jim Raynor? He and his crew are taking steroids like they’re going outta style! Their proportions are wacky.
They were probably going for that, but for me, that just made me facepalm and go:
“…REALLY?”
I thought Jim and others are really well proportioned. There are real people out there way more deformed and outrageous looking.
And Humans would need the best to save their arses….wouldn’t they?
I thought the look was inspired by PCM, not by alcoholism.
http://indianapublicmedia.org/amomentofscience/the-bloated-look-of-the-starving/
Frankly anybody that gets offended by how a character looks in a video game should go sit in the back seat of the bus with the soccer moms. I mean really? The starting gear for Demon Hunter and Wizard is irksome? You’re free to dislike a chosen art style just as you’re free to choose what kind of foods you like to eat, but that whole article reeks of feminism. Oh no, don’t show off the female figure, it’s not right! It’s wrong to show a female as a sex object despite the fact they dress that way to get attention all the time! Sexy sells, get over it. The only valid point in the whole article is that it makes no sense to wear armor that looks like a bikini, I mean…that protects what exactly?
Oh no, women rejecting an unreasonable and vastly differing standard of beauty! Anything but that!
((( Save me, sutasafaia!
Unreasonable standard of beauty, yes, but we’re talking about a video game. Standards of beauty are always higher in video games, comics, movies, etc. (i.e., fiction) for both men and women. Both men and women like to look at beautiful people. And do you think the average man looks as masculine as the male Barbarian, let alone the female Barbarian?
As for “differing standard of beauty,” I’m not so sure what is meant by that. It looks interesting, but does it actually mean anything?
That being said, I’m pro more practical armor for women in video games, television shows, and movies. However, the woman who wrote this opinion piece seems to be a bit extreme. She seems to be offended by the sexuality of women on any level in video games, which is strange since all human beings are sexual on some level. I think she has some growing up to do.
“it makes no sense to wear armor that looks like a bikini, I mean…that protects what exactly?”
The M rating…
Haha, nice one Flux.
“The only valid point in the whole article is that it makes no sense to wear armor that looks like a bikini, I mean…that protects what exactly?”
Uhh, you validated her entire argument. She is writing about female character models being unrealistic, and it looks like you agree with her. I didn’t read any sort of feminist agenda in her article.
And feminism is a bad thing? All it’s asking is for men and women to be treated the same or do you reckon we should make women into second class citizens where we can all oggle at them while men lech?
Sexy sells is not the issue, sexy to only men is the issue, why should women be treated differently? I hate to have to inform you but women dress up because you know they like to wear clothes and not be naked, it’s your problem if you get cheap thrills from that. Just switch the issue 180 and imagine walking down the street being drooled after and given admiring looks from all the women, then imagine half of those women are old, or ugly, a quarter of them are just rude to you, another portion just wolfwhistle and say how they’d hit that, and maybe just maybe one woman tries to be nice and normal and not opens the door for you because well you’re a man. If that doesn’t explain the situation try imaging that but having women substituted for bi/*** men.
TLDR Get over here into the 21st century and stop being a pig.
P.S. Yes I’m a bloke
Social conditioning at its finest.
It’s sad really, they had to end the post on a personal insult. I had a good reply all typed out, even had it posted for about twenty minutes, but then remembered my #1 rule about discussions on the internet: Don’t bother trying to have an intelligent discussion with somebody who thinks personal insults belong in said discussion.
Saying that you’re “being a pig” (which you are) is a little different than saying you are a pig.
That said, if you’re so against people who involve personal insults in discussion, why are you willing to converse with “Matt”? Or does this just apply when people personally insult you?
Contemporary feminism is a bad thing, yes. Much of it has to do with feminizing boys, masculinizing girls, making men look bad, making women look good, and giving women special privileges over men. Oh, and they do all of this while they brainwash people into thinking that women are still second-class citizens in first-world countries like the US.
Pretty much this. Real feminism isn’t even limited to men/women being equal, it’s about making every human being equal in every way possible for every reason no matter what. It’s about genuinely removing any differences between a person based solely on anything other than talent, skills, intelligence, etc. Sadly I think the ideals of true feminism won’t ever come fully to fruition without a utopian world, but that said, I applaud people who are willing to fight for genuine equality between all.
Care to cite any sources on those claims, or are we just supposed to assume that you’re full of **** and not bother asking?
I just read the rest of the article, and it wasn’t that bad.
She discusses Kerrigan and a couple of other things from Diablo II and SC.
They’re wearing plausible armor. Plausible, high-heeled armor.
No **** right? The demon hunter’s female version is so poorly designed in that area. I don’t think anyone would have high heels in a demon infested world.
The female Barb looks great – Blzzard did a really good job giving her the mass to look physically imposing while retaining her femininity.
yeah I totally agree blizzard did a really nice job making her, but I am still playing male barb :d
They didn’t do a good job at retaining her femininity at all. Big bones and bulky muscles with hard facial features does not equal feminine.
That being said, she does look imposing.
I mostly play male characters and the two characters I plan on playing female (Wizard and Monk) I am naming after my daughters, so it would feel weird for me running them around in steel bikinis.
Then don’t name them as your daughter? Duh…
Its wrong or at least weird naming game chars after your own kids in the first place! End of discussion -_-
Incgamers should put up a poll to see if people want their video game women to be “realistic” or have huge boobs, tiny waists, and skimpy armor.
We had a big discussion about that back in 2009. Sadly, it’s from before we switched news scripts and lost all comments on the old posts, so the 100+ replies are gone.
http://diablo.incgamers.com/blog/comments/guest-article-does-d3-need-a-sexy-character
Might be worth revisiting the issue with a vote or at least a discussion, now that we know what all the classes look like.
If I want to see mostly naked hot female skin I don’t need a video game*. But I’ll let D3 provide the sweet characters, items, leveling, skills, and coop.
* I meant my wife, but you’re right, the internet works too.
The women in the game have to look realistic in every way, just like all the demons, spells, and other things in D3 that also exist in real life.
I’m trying to understand the thrust of this piece.