The first weekend of Diablo 3 Seasons has ended. How did the ladder rushers enjoy the experience? Which fast leveling strategies worked best (and worst), and does the Torment 6 “kill nothing but level fast” cheese need to be fixed? Featuring Wolfpaq, Rankil, N3rdwords, Katniss, and Flux. Following up Friday’s Season-prep show, this is a […]
Everything about Legendary Gems in this two-part show. LGem basics, how they’re found and upgraded, why they are so awesome, and then detailed discussion of the best builds, upgrade values, and uses for every gem. Featuring Katniss, Ynzerg, and Flux. Due to the amount of content to cover, with 14 legendary gems, this show is […]
- The latest Weight Loss drug
- RoS: How are you Demon Hunters doing?
- No diet-exercise mandatory,
- A "Could Be Useful" Amulet - Item Find Thread August…
- Salman Khan’s presence in Marathi film Lai Bhaari
- Blizzard on Legendary Gem Bugs
- The Off-Topic Thread: The kestegs-free version
- Old D2 player playin some D3...
- Legendary crafting items
- You think you know God? You probably do not.
- Gear Suggestions for a Sader
- Etdlahq Memorial Bar - your shelter from forum…
Blizzard on Follower StrengthPosted 10 Sep 2012 by
A couple of Blue posts this morning about Followers don’t provide any new info, but one brings up an issue worthy of debate.
I remember the followers in D2, where if you gave them the right weapon they could match your dps, or provide an incredible buff (Insight or Infinity). At the very least, though, they would provide a great damage boost, and if geared right would make an excellent meat shield.
Vaeflare: Never fear! We’re actually actively looking into the relative strength of followers.
They spend the entire time with you, chatting, helping out, adding their magic find to your pool. All they really want is to help defeat the Prime Evil in the final battle. But then they get denied. Is that really fair? I mean, I’d be really disappointed if I spent all that time working towards something and then never being able to realize the dream.
Vaeflare: I think that they were glad to offer their services to support the hero on their quests and adventures in any way they could, and I’m sure that they, like Tyrael, indeed yearned to join in the fight. They also had their own stories — some of which were resolved in-part by the end of Diablo III, while others were left open. But I also think that part of the hero’s journey is realizing that some fights must be tackled and overcome alone, and in this case, only your hero was strong enough to push forth and face the Prime Evil mano-a-mano.
The D3 team felt they were too strong in D2, and that having a well-equipped follower was almost essential, so their design theory in D3 was to make them purely a source of minor buffs and witty banter. (Check the Followers page in the wiki for a ton of blue quotes on this balance issue.)
The D3 devs succeeded surprisingly well at that balancing, but that doesn’t mean you approve of the current system. So what do you guys think? How about a vote…
How strong should Followers be in Diablo 3?
- 2) I want a return to the D2-style of big damage Followers. (56%, 1,712 Votes)
- 1) I like the current buffs-but-low-damage design. (31%, 964 Votes)
- 4) No opinion/not sure/something else. (8%, 232 Votes)
- 3) I want Followers out of the game entirely. (5%, 153 Votes)
Total Voters: 3,061