Battle.net to Start Charging Admission?

Posted 29th May 2009 11:21 PM by Flux

I hesitate to shout “troll!” at an actual article on a semi-actual gaming site, but I think I have to in this case. Here’s the article, from GotGame.com. It’s a short editorial that argues that Blizzard will begin charging a (monthly?) fee to play games on Battle.net, especially once SC2 and D3 are out.

The main points, such as they are, is that everything costs more money these days, that WoW has a monthly fee, that the newly-modernized user accounts on Battle.net will make it easy to charge users for access, and that Blizzard is so popular they could get away with it.  It’s not necessarily trolling to speculate about this sort of thing, but the author needs to provide some actual evidence, or at least a convincing theory behind their argument. This article does neither. A quote:

Don’t believe it? Of course this may just be some crazy theory, but there is a convincing argument that may get you thinking.

...Theory’s [sic] like this could be way off base. However, it is completely within Blizzards [sic] grasp to do such a thing. The irony behind this is it easily imaginable that it would cost Blizzard zero players!

I found this useless, and feel sort of dirty for even linking to it. Perhaps I’m expecting too much from online gaming journalism, much of which is entirely driven by a, “create controversy to get hits” business model…




Update: I’m not saying the premise is impossible. In fact I personally think it’s fairly likely that we’ll see some type of fees added to Battle.net in the future. What type? Tiered service, with more features for pay? RMT? Monthly fees? None of the above? I don’t know. But I think if you’re going to write an article about a topic as potentially-explosive as this, you’ve got to do it carefully and professionally. Bring the links, bring the comparisons to other fee-based online communities, find quotes from Blizzard guys on the issue, etc. Don’t just throw out some wild speculation with nothing to back it up.

Here’s a useful link; took me 5 seconds to find. Leonard Boyarsky from last year’s Blizzcon:

In terms of the financial model, our ideal, our goal has always been to make the game first. You know, what’s going to make the best game? And then we’ll figure out what we need to do to support that on a financial model side. Obviously we understand what people want and don’t want from a financial model. As Blizzard always does, we’re going to take into account what people are looking for and we don’t ever want to feel like we’re ripping people off. We like to give a lot of value for whatever money it’s spent in on our games.

Anyone can make some wild claim and vomit up a garbled article full of vague claims, circumstantial evidence, and typos. For example, here’s an article I found pulled out of http://www.FluxsArse.com. Click through to read the shocking investigative report.

Battle.net 2.0’s Ultimate Purpose: Blizzard’s Grand Scheme to Replace Expensive Western Players with Lower-Cost Chinese Gamers

Now that Blizzard has transitioned to Battle.net 2.0, they possess real names and contact information for everyone who uses their service. In many cases they also have credit card and other financial information for their users, thanks to WoW subscriptions, Blizzard Store sales, streaming downloads, and more. Blizzard also has a huge fan base in China, many of whom are dangerous cyber criminals, as evidenced by their constant gold farming and character level up service spamming.

It’s clear from this convincing evidence that Blizzard is secretly in league with these Chinese gamers. If they were not, they’d ban them from World of Warcraft. It’s just that simple.

Therefore, Blizzard must be collecting their personal information as well. I know this sounds crazy, but just look at the evidence. Here’s the truth!  Blizzard is planning to abduct and disappear most of their American and European fans, secretly replacing them with Chinese gold farmers.Western players consume a disproportionate amount of bandwidth and customer support time, while playing their games for free, rather than paying hourly, as gamers do in Asia. For great profit, Blizzard will disappear their Western gamers and replace them with more efficient Chinese gamers, who cause less trouble and have lower labor costs.

This plan will cut Blizzard’s costs greatly, while boosting their profits. Battle.net will therefore no longer be free, while Blizzard Entertainment will operate the world’s largest ring of abduction and white slavery. I know it sounds crazy, but if you look at the evidence it’s thought provoking!




Bookmark and Share
Filed under: Battle.net, Humour

Comments

Page 1 of 5 pages  1 2 3 >  Last »
DylWeed
Posted 30, May 2009 12:47 AM
(0)
 

Well, the author did state that his article was just a theory (thus his own opinion) several times..

I think that its definitely a possibility that Blizz may make the Battle.net account pay-to-play. Even if its just one payment up front.

Though I understand we would all be very upset about it; i personally wouldn’t pay. :/

Reply
 
wrxwagon
Posted 30, May 2009 01:26 AM
(0)
 

I agree with the first poster.  Since Blizzard hasn’t come out and said there won’t be a fee, it’s certainly reasonable not to rule out that possiblity.  I will also not be paying :(

Reply
 
qOcOp
Posted 30, May 2009 01:45 AM
(0)
 

Fuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Reply
 
Kiroptus
Posted 30, May 2009 02:50 AM
(0)
 

Well if its a quality service, unlike bnet1 then maybe I would give it a shot, maybe if they plan to release more games that support the bnet feature so in the end, you would have a platform to support many of their games.

Also it would have to be pretty damn cheap, like 5 dollars, nothing like the WoW’s 15 dollars a month because its another case.

Reply
 
Krugar
Posted 30, May 2009 02:56 AM
(0)
 

What I find hilarious is the article author at GotGame.com reasoning that a paying B.Net wouldn’t cost Blizzard any players.

Noun: theory
1. A well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena

Noun: guess
1. A message expressing an opinion based on incomplete evidence

Reply
 
bighannibal
Posted 30, May 2009 02:56 AM
(0)
 

Sounds reasonable.
Sad but true.

Though they would loose a veteran customer in me, then.
Didn’t pay WoW either, and in the end I don’t even regret it.

Reply
 
ZMDI
Posted 30, May 2009 03:02 AM
(0)
 

I’ll be the first boycotting blizzard if that’s the case.

Free battle.net should be free.

Reply
 
Kaeros
Posted 30, May 2009 03:13 AM
(0)
 

I’m in support of a small monthly fee to be on Battle.net.  $4.99 a month seems about fair, and I’d be more than happy to pay it.  I really doubt Bnet2.0 is going to be free, unfortunately.

Reply
 
ThomasJ
Posted 30, May 2009 03:32 AM
(0)
 

With Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3 obviously having different release dates, I can’t see how they will be charging a fee for Bnet. On the other hand this is Blizzard so anything is possible with them.

Reply
 
ExtraCrispy
Posted 30, May 2009 05:35 AM
(0)
 

Blizzard is smart. But they’ve also shown they have integrity.  They certainly could charge a fee, but they also know that it would cost them players.

I don’t care what anyone says.  There will be NO fee for any increment of time.  The most likely solution is advertising in the Battle.net lobbies.  It would be simple, un-intrusive, and potentially quite lucrative due to how many players constantly shuffle into and out of Bnet, especially for Starcraft.  They will likely only offer paid services for Meta effects, such as re-naming or starting an official clan in SC2.  There will NOT be tiered service.  I would bet my index finger on that.

Reply
 
Page 1 of 5 pages  1 2 3 >  Last »

Syndicate