Activision / Blizzard Merger Issues

Posted 1st Aug 2008 02:21 AM by Flux

Also from Blizzard’s recent NYC media meet, this article on Kotaku about the overall company direction, post-Activision merger. The interview is with WoW director Jeffrey Kaplan, but the information applies to to all Blizzard’s ongoing projects.

“There’s no outside influence at all in the development of Diablo 3, StarCraft 2 or WoW.” In fact, Blizzard sees an upside to being hitched to the Activision star. “They have a lot of expertise in the console area, where we’re very-headed in addition to PC and online,” Kaplan said. “Activision’s point of view is, there’s a lot of trust in Blizzard and what we do. Activision’s just trying to figure out how we work and try to learn from us.”

However, might Activision might push to implement some changes to the game design and financial models?  RMT or microtransactions in WoW or D3? Blizzard’s certainly considering it, and despite numerous opportunities, they’ve never said that D3 will be free on b.net, just as D2 was. They’re keeping their options open:

Jay Wilson, lead designer on Diablo III, summed up the developer’s policy on the microtransactions issue: “I think we always look to make the game we want to make, and then figure out the kind of financial model that works with that game.”

In related news, Activision/Blizzard just posted their June quarter sales, and they’re #1, with over $1b in revenues, well ahead of EA’s $800m for the same time frame.




Bookmark and Share
Filed under:

Related Headlines

Comments

Page 1 of 1 pages
Leord
Posted 01, Aug 2008 02:47 PM
(0)
 

Just gonna mention that the later quote bodes well for a free Battle.net 2.0…

Reply
 
Flux
Posted 01, Aug 2008 05:47 PM
(0)
 

does it?  One could nitpick and point out that Jay’s only been working at blizzard for 2 years so it’s not like he’s got any experience with their game launches. But what exactly does his comment mean? There have only been 2 blizzard financial models.  WoW for $15/month, and everything else for free.

They clearly didn’t work on wow for 5 years and then at the last minute think, “Hmm, maybe a monthly fee?”  they had a monthly fee in mind from the start. that’s the whole point in an MMO. perpetual cash cow.  that they’ve not yet come out and said, “d3 will be free on bnet like d2 was” means they’re trying to think of how they can get some continuing income from the game. That doesn’t mean they’re going to make it monthly fee, but economic realties means they’re keeping their options open.

Not to jinx things, but they sound a great deal like all the HGL guys did during that game’s development. Where you got the feeling they were trying to figure a way for continuing revenue stream w/o coming out and admitting it. And that strategy didn’t work out so well, in the end.

Reply
 
Page 1 of 1 pages

Syndicate